Medical negligence has increasingly come under legal scrutiny in India as the healthcare sector expands and patients become more aware of their rights. It occurs when a medical professional fails to provide appropriate treatment, breaches their duty of care, or causes injury through a negligent act or omission. This article provides an overview of how medical negligence is addressed in Indian law, notable judicial decisions, and new legislative developments aimed at improving accountability and patient protection.
Understanding Medical Negligence
Medical negligence refers to a situation where a healthcare provider breaches their duty of care towards a patient, resulting in harm. The breach could involve errors in diagnosis, surgical mistakes, prescribing incorrect medication, or failure to obtain informed consent.
In Indian jurisprudence, for a claim of medical negligence to succeed, the following elements must be proven:
- Duty of Care owed by the medical practitioner.
- Breach of Duty through negligent action or omission.
- Causation, showing that the breach led directly to harm or injury.
Legal Framework Governing Medical Negligence in India
Medical negligence is addressed through multiple legal avenues in India:
- Tort Law (Civil Remedies): Victims can claim compensation through civil suits for damages.
- Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Patients can approach consumer forums for deficiency in service.
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS): Replacing the Indian Penal Code, BNS now governs criminal liability in cases of medical negligence.
Relevant provisions under BNS include:
- Section 106(1): Punishes causing death by negligence, applicable in cases where a medical act of carelessness leads to a patient’s death.
- Section 123: Covers acts endangering life or personal safety of others due to rash or negligent conduct.
- Section 124: Deals with causing hurt by reckless or negligent acts.
Landmark Judicial Decisions
1. Indian Medical Association v. V.P. Shantha (1995)
This case brought medical services within the scope of the Consumer Protection Act, enabling patients to file complaints against healthcare providers for deficiency in service.
2. Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab (2005)
The Court clarified that for criminal liability in medical negligence cases, the negligence must be gross or reckless. It adopted the Bolam Test, which states that a professional is not negligent if their actions are consistent with a responsible body of medical opinion.
3. Kusum Sharma v. Batra Hospital (2010)
The judgment emphasized that courts must ensure fairness to both patients and medical professionals and that negligence must be established with concrete evidence.
Recent Legal Developments and Reforms
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 has significantly strengthened the framework for addressing medical negligence by introducing improved mechanisms for grievance redressal, including mediation, e-filing of complaints, and revised pecuniary jurisdiction. This empowers patients to hold medical professionals and healthcare institutions accountable for deficiencies in service. Complementing this, the National Medical Commission (NMC) Act, 2019 replaced the Medical Council of India and now oversees the regulation of medical education and professional conduct. The NMC has the authority to take disciplinary action against practitioners found guilty of ethical or professional misconduct. Additionally, the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 aims to ensure standardized and quality healthcare by mandating minimum requirements for clinical institutions. However, its implementation remains uneven across various states due to the decentralized nature of health governance in India.
Challenges in Proving Medical Negligence
Despite legal remedies, hurdles remain:
- Lack of expert medical witnesses willing to testify.
- Technical nature of evidence.
- Long delays in litigation.
- Defensive medical practices that prioritize legal protection over patient care
Medical negligence law in India continues to evolve in the wake of judicial interpretation and legislative reform. While laws like the Consumer Protection Act and NMC Act strengthen patient rights, balanced safeguards must ensure that healthcare professionals are not subjected to undue litigation. A robust medico-legal framework should ultimately aim for a system where both accountability and empathy prevail.
More Current Affairs: https://learnproacademy.in/updates/