Thailand–Cambodia Border Dispute -

Introduction: From Border Skirmish to Diplomatic Crisis

What began as a brief exchange of gunfire in the dense jungles along the Thailand–Cambodia border has spiraled into a full-blown crisis. On May 28, 2025, tensions reignited between the two Southeast Asian neighbors when Cambodian and Thai forces clashed near the Chong Bok checkpoint. One Cambodian soldier was killed, and both sides blamed each other for initiating the violence.

But this is far from an isolated incident it’s the latest chapter in a century-old dispute rooted in colonial maps, contested temples, and unresolved nationalism. The fallout now threatens not only regional stability but also domestic politics in Thailand.

What Sparked the Clash?

The immediate flashpoint was a military skirmish near Morokot village, adjacent to the Chong Bok crossing. Cambodia accused Thailand of aggression, while Thailand claimed Cambodian soldiers entered disputed territory and fired first. In response, Thailand deployed artillery units, and Cambodia followed with rocket launchers and troop reinforcements.

This escalation reflects unresolved tensions dating back to the Franco-Siamese Treaty of 1907, where French-drawn maps defined borders between Siam (Thailand) and colonial Indochina (now Cambodia). Areas like Preah Vihear, awarded to Cambodia by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1962, remain symbolic and sensitive. Despite ICJ rulings, disputes over surrounding land persist.

Economic Fallout: Border Closed, Lives Disrupted

The impact was immediate and widespread. Thailand closed multiple border checkpoints, including the key crossings at Chong Sa-Ngam and Chong Chom, affecting thousands of traders and workers. Cambodia responded by halting Thai imports ranging from fruits and vegetables to beauty products and cut off electricity and fuel supply to some Thai border areas.

Poipet, a Cambodian border town reliant on Thai tourism and trade, became eerily quiet. Thai businesses in Aranyaprathet reported heavy losses. Workers who cross daily for jobs in casinos, markets, and construction have been left jobless.

The Phone Call That Rocked Bangkok

Just as diplomatic efforts were beginning, another firestorm broke out this time in Bangkok. A leaked June 15 phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian PM Hun Sen revealed her criticizing the Thai military and addressing Hun Sen as “uncle.” This perceived coziness with Cambodia’s strongman shocked the Thai public and triggered mass protests.

Opposition parties accused her of undermining Thai sovereignty, and calls for her resignation intensified. The constitutional court and anti-corruption body are now reviewing petitions for her removal. The Bhumjaithai Party, a coalition ally, has pulled support, plunging the government into a legitimacy crisis.

Cambodia’s Strategy: Lawfare and Leverage

Cambodia, meanwhile, has signaled its intention to bring the matter back to the International Court of Justice as it did during the Preah Vihear dispute in 2011. PM Hun Manet emphasized a commitment to peaceful resolution but defended Cambodia’s sovereignty. His father, Hun Sen, went further, accusing Thailand of “military adventurism” and suggesting long-term trade restrictions.

Thailand opposes ICJ involvement, insisting that the dispute should be resolved bilaterally through mechanisms like the Joint Border Commission (JBC) and General Border Committee (GBC). Talks have resumed, but Cambodia has refused to discuss several temple sites, complicating progress.

Regional and Global Implications

This isn’t just a bilateral conflict it’s drawing in the region. ASEAN member states have called for restraint, while both countries are quietly lobbying support from China, Malaysia, and the UN Security Council. The risk of internationalizing the crisis is growing, especially if Cambodia follows through with ICJ proceedings.

Moreover, economic interdependence is significant. Cambodia relies on Thai exports, while Thailand depends on Cambodian labor. The longer the standoff lasts, the more both economies will suffer.

Conclusion: Can Diplomacy Prevail?

The Thailand–Cambodia conflict is more than a fight over maps. It’s a test of leadership, diplomacy, and national identity. While military escalation has so far been limited, political instability in Thailand, economic blockades, and legal brinkmanship pose serious risks to peace.

As tempers cool and talks resume, the key question is whether reason can prevail over rhetoric. Will both nations choose to draw the line diplomatically or let battlelines harden? The world watches, hoping it’s the former.

Sources:

More Current Affairs: https://learnproacademy.in/updates/