India Ranked 4th Most Equal Country by World Bank Gini Index: What It Really Means -

In a significant and somewhat unexpected development, India has emerged as the fourth most equal country in the world in terms of income distribution, according to the latest Gini Index data released by the World Bank. This revelation marks a turning point in the global narrative about income inequality in developing economies, particularly in a nation as large and diverse as India. However, the ranking also raises important questions about how income equality is measured, and whether statistical parity reflects actual economic justice.

What Is the Gini Index?

To understand the implications of India’s new standing, it is essential to delve into the Gini Index—the metric responsible for this global ranking. Named after Italian statistician Corrado Gini, the Gini Index (or Gini Coefficient) is a measure of income or wealth distribution within a country. It ranges between 0 and 1, where 0 represents perfect equality (everyone has the same income), and 1 indicates perfect inequality (one person has all the income, and others have none).

Typically, a lower Gini score reflects a more equitable distribution of income. According to the World Bank’s latest report, India’s Gini coefficient stands at 0.29, a notably low figure that places it just behind countries like Slovenia, Belarus, and Slovakia, which traditionally top equality charts due to their strong welfare and redistribution systems.

India’s Position in Global Context

India’s new rank comes as a surprise to many, especially considering its historical economic disparities. As a country of 1.4 billion people, India has long struggled with income inequality, regional disparities, and social stratification based on caste, gender, and rural-urban divides. Yet, the latest Gini data suggests that income inequality has reduced considerably, at least statistically.

This doesn’t necessarily mean that poverty has disappeared or that the rich-poor divide has been eliminated. Rather, it reflects a narrowing of income gaps due to multiple factors, such as:

Massive welfare transfers through schemes like PM Garib Kalyan Yojana, free food grain distribution, and cash transfers during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Rising minimum wage floors and increased formalization in sectors like construction and services.
Government initiatives promoting digital inclusion, direct benefit transfers, and Aadhaar-linked social schemes, which have ensured that benefits reach even the most marginalized.

What Does This Equality Represent?

It is important to interpret the Gini Index within a broader socio-economic context. Equality in income distribution does not automatically equate to prosperity or economic development. In some cases, low income inequality can result from widespread poverty, where most people earn similarly low incomes. This appears to be part of the case in India.

In fact, critics argue that the current income equality might be “equality at a low level of income”. That is, although the income gap between the richest and poorest may have narrowed, this may be due to a flattening of incomes across the board, including stagnation or contraction in middle and upper-middle-class earnings. Moreover, wealth inequality (which is different from income inequality) remains extremely high in India. Reports from Oxfam and Credit Suisse show that the top 1% of the population still holds a disproportionately large share of the country’s wealth. The Gini Index, being a measure of income and not wealth, fails to capture this dimension of inequality.

India’s Recent Welfare Expansion

The current ranking is largely attributed to India’s aggressive welfare expansion over the past decade. Landmark schemes like:

Ayushman Bharat (PMJAY) – the world’s largest health insurance scheme,
PM-KISAN – direct income support to farmers,
Free LPG connections under Ujjwala Yojana, and
Massive electrification and housing schemes under PMAY,

have helped uplift millions from extreme poverty, reducing the income differential across states and rural-urban regions. Additionally, the increase in women’s labor participation in the informal sector and digitization of public services has contributed to a more uniform income distribution, though not necessarily higher incomes.

Limitations and the Road Ahead

Despite the improved Gini score, challenges remain. Large-scale unemployment, inflation, and a declining middle class could reverse this trend. Moreover, disparities in access to education, health care, and digital infrastructure still persist and often correlate with income outcomes in the long term. Also, the underground economy, where transactions are not recorded, can distort the actual measurement of inequality. The Gini Index, relying on survey data and income declarations, may underrepresent the earnings of the wealthiest who tend to obscure true incomes.

Conclusion

India’s recognition as the fourth most equal country by the Gini Index is both a testament to recent redistributive policies and a cautionary tale. While the reduction in income inequality is commendable, true economic equality must go beyond income and address access to resources, wealth concentration, and long-term opportunity gaps. Policymakers must now focus on sustainable growth with equity, ensuring that the benefits of development reach all citizens, not just statistically but substantively. In the end, the Gini Index may have measured a form of equality, but real equality in India is still a work in progress.

Sources:

More Current Affairs: https://learnproacademy.in/updates/